AI visibility audit
kikai
kikai: what an assistant can read, and what it cannot check
Partly measured on 6 October 2026. 38 live pages crawled, plus a direct request as each of 6 AI crawlers. Google profile read on 7 October 2026.
What this comes down to
13 things make kikai's website harder for an assistant to find, read and check, 5 of them urgent. The first is: Pages that used to work now return an error. 5 of the things a buyer would go and check are missing or do not match, starting with: Google says Kikai opens six days a week, and the site never gives an hour.
Read
Can an AI read this website?
This is the foundation. Before an assistant can say anything about a business, it has to be able to fetch the pages and find real text in them. None of this is about being liked or ranked: it is about whether the door opens and whether there is anything readable behind it.
- Fails, priority A+. Pages that used to work now return an error 12 page(s) returned 200 in the Wayback Machine and now return 404 or 410: /bl/10-massatges, /bl/13-bons, /bl/content/4-es-terapeuta, /bl/inici/22-114-massatge-anti-cellulitis.html, /bl/inici/22-117-massatge-anti-cellulitis.html, /bl/inici/22-massatge-anti-cellulitis.html and 6 more. Anything that linked to them, and any answer that cited them, is now broken.
What this means
Any link, citation or bookmark pointing at those addresses now lands on an error. That includes the pages assistants may already have read.
- Fails, priority A+. No structured data anywhere Not one of the 38 pages carries JSON-LD, so nothing on the site states outright what the business is, what it sells or who is behind it. Those facts are left to be inferred from the prose.
What this means
Structured data is the machine-readable version of the facts already on your pages: who you are, what you sell, where you work. Without it those facts have to be inferred from prose, and inference is where you get described as something you are not.
- Fails, priority A. The sitemap lists nothing A sitemap was found but it lists no pages at all, while 38 live pages were crawled.
What this means
A sitemap that lists no pages is worse than none: it answers the question with an empty list, so a crawler has no reason to look further.
- Fails, priority A. Duplicate titles "Kikai Acupuntura y Terapias alternativas en Mallorca" on 2 pages; "Iniciar sesión" on 3 pages; "Kikai - Acupuntura masajes y terapias alternativas a domicilio en Mallorca" on 8 pages; "Terapias alternativas en Mallorca | Terapias naturales a domicilio" on 2 pages; "Acupuntura estética en Mallorca|Biolifting facial en Mallorca" on 2 pages; "Acupuntura |Moxa |Ventosas |Palma de Mallorca. Consulta y a domicilio" on 2 pages
What this means
Two pages with the same title look like the same page. Anything choosing between them has nothing to choose on.
- Fails, priority A. Pages with no meta description 14 of 38: /es/iniciar-sesion?create_account=1, /es/mi-cuenta, /es/blog.html, /es/15-acupuntura, /es/content/10-libros-y-ebooks, /es/2-inicio and 8 more. This is the sentence an engine quotes when it lists them.
What this means
The meta description is often the sentence quoted about the page. Without one, the quoting engine takes whatever text it finds first, which is frequently a menu.
- Fails, priority B. Duplicate meta descriptions 2 pages share one description; 2 pages share one description; 2 pages share one description; 2 pages share one description
What this means
A description repeated across pages describes none of them.
- Fails, priority B. Pages with no canonical tag 22 of 38: /, /es/contactenos, /es, /bl, /en, /es/iniciar-sesion?create_account=1 and 16 more
What this means
The canonical tag is where you say which address is the real one. Without it a search engine picks one itself, and the same page reached two ways can end up counted twice.
- Fails, priority B. Pages with no Open Graph tags 27 of 38. Nothing on the page sets the title, description and image used when one of its addresses is shared, so whatever is quoting it chooses for itself.
What this means
Open Graph tags are how you choose the title, description and image shown when one of your addresses is shared. Without them, whatever is quoting the page chooses for you.
- Fails, priority B. No clear primary heading 16 page(s) do not state their subject in one main heading: 1 with no main heading at all, 15 where several compete for it. /, /es/contactenos, /es, /bl, /en, /es/inicio/21-acupuntura-estetica.html and 10 more
What this means
The H1 is the page's own statement of what it is. None leaves it unstated, several leave it ambiguous.
- Fails, priority C. There is no llms.txt Requested directly and it returns 404. Not a standard and nobody should promise results from it, but it is one file and it is the only place a business gets to state what it is in its own words.
What this means
llms.txt is a short plain-English summary of what the business is and what it sells, written for assistants. It is not yet a standard and nobody should promise results from it, but it costs one file and it is the one place you get to state the business in your own words.
- Fails, priority C. Title length off 28 page(s) outside 30 to 65 characters: /es/contactenos, /es/iniciar-sesion?create_account=1, /es/mi-cuenta, /es/blog.html, /es/15-acupuntura, /es/11-terapias-alternativas and 22 more
What this means
Very short titles carry no information, very long ones get cut mid-phrase.
- Fails, priority C. Heading levels skip 16 page(s), for example /: h2 to h5, h2 to h5, h2 to h5, h2 to h5, h2 to h5, h1 to h3, h1 to h4, h1 to h3
What this means
Headings are how a machine works out which parts of a page belong to which. Skipping levels leaves that hierarchy less clear than it could be.
- Fails, priority C. Images with no alt text 6 image(s) across 6 page(s).
What this means
Alt text is what an image says to a screen reader and to anything reading the page as text. Missing, the image says nothing.
- Not checked. Whether the text is in the HTML before JavaScript runs not checked Comparing what a fetch returns against what a browser ends up with needs the page opened in a real browser, and that was not done on this run.
What this means
Some sites send an almost empty page and then draw the content with code once it is open in a browser. People see a full page. An assistant that only reads what was sent sees the empty one.
11 checks pass
- Passes. Those crawlers actually get in Asked for the homepage as each of the 6 in turn, and every one was let in with a 200. This is a separate check from robots.txt: a rule at the CDN can block a crawler the file allows.
- Passes. robots.txt is there and it reads correctly Fetched and parsed, not just found: 5048 bytes of real directives, 1 user-agent group(s), 133 disallow rule(s), and it declares no sitemap.
- Passes. A sitemap is published, so the pages are declared rather than only linked.
- Passes. Every live page has a title.
- Passes. No page is too thin to answer anything.
- Passes. Every structured-data block parses.
- Passes. A made-up address returns a real error instead of a page.
- Passes. The error page offers a way back into the site.
- Passes. No tracking tag is double-counted.
- Passes. Pages link to each other, so the site can be walked.
- Passes. Every live page has something linking to it.
Trust
Can a buyer check what this site says?
A site can be perfectly readable and still not be believed. This step compares what the site claims against what a stranger can verify: a number behind every claim, a person behind the business, and the same details wherever the business appears.
- Fails, priority A. Google says Kikai opens six days a week, and the site never gives an hour The Google profile lists Monday to Thursday 5 to 9 PM, Friday 3 to 9 PM, Saturday 9 AM to 7 PM, Sunday closed. No page on the site states opening hours, and the footer says "Exclusivamente con Cita Previa". Asked whether Kikai is open on a Saturday, an assistant finds a yes on Google and an appointment-only answer on the site.
What this means
Where a name, address, phone or list of services differs between a website and its profiles, the difference is what gets noticed, and it makes every other claim look less certain.
- Fails, priority B. The site shows four Google reviews and no way to count the other 17 /es, /en and /bl embed four 5-star Google reviews. Each one links to the reviewer's own Google page, none links to Kikai's profile, and no page states the rating or the number of reviews. The Google profile itself shows 4.8 from 21 reviews (read on 7 October 2026).
What this means
A rating on your own website is a claim, not evidence. What makes it evidence is a link to the place the reviews live, where a stranger can count them.
- Fails, priority B. The Google Business Profile is not linked from the site The only Google links on the site point to individual reviewers' pages (google.com/maps/contrib/...). Nothing links to the profile at Carrer Francesc Sancho, 7, where the rating and all 21 reviews can be read.
What this means
The profile is where a stranger goes to check that the business exists at that address and that the reviews are real. A site that links to it hands over that check; a site that does not leaves it to be searched for.
- Fails, priority C. Nobody is named in a way a machine can read No Person markup anywhere on the 38 pages crawled. Names may be written in the prose, and prose is where an assistant has to guess which name is the founder and which is a testimonial.
What this means
Structured data is the machine-readable version of facts already on the page. Without it those facts have to be guessed from prose, and guessing is where a business gets described as something it is not.
- Fails, priority C. The street is spelled two ways The Google profile says Carrer Francesc Sancho, 7; the site says C/Francisco Sancho, 7. Same street, in Catalan and in Spanish, but a machine matching the two has to know that.
What this means
An address that is written the same way everywhere is matched without thinking. One written two ways has to be reasoned about, and every guess is a place to get it wrong.
- Not checked. Whether a licence number is published not checked This business does not need a licence to operate, so there is no number to look for.
4 checks pass
- Passes. A price is published where a visitor can read it Found on 7 page(s), for example /bl.
- Passes. The site links to a review or business listing, so its claims can be checked somewhere else.
- Passes. Enquiries arrive saying what they are about.
- Passes. Name, phone, website and the rest of the address match the Google profile Kikai, +34 622 65 16 16, kikai.es, number 7, Entresuelo Principal B2, 07004 Palma: the same on the profile and in the site's footer.
Recommend
Would an assistant recommend this business?
Read and Trust are facts about one website on one day, and anyone with a browser can check every line above. Whether an assistant actually recommends a business is a different kind of question: one answer proves nothing, because it can change tomorrow. Answering it properly means asking the questions your buyers ask, week after week, watching who gets named, and telling a real shift from noise. That is the paid work, it is not part of this report, and this report is complete without it.
How this was measured
The website was read on 6 October 2026. 38 live pages crawled, plus a direct request as each of 6 AI crawlers. Every check above is a fact from that crawl or from a request made to the site, and each carries the evidence it came from.
The Google Business Profile, from the link given with the request, was opened in a browser on 7 October 2026 and compared with the site field by field: name, address, phone, website and opening hours.
Nothing needed an account, and nothing was measured that a visitor cannot see.
Nothing here was measured that is not publicly visible, and no account access was used. The site read for this report was https://kikai.es, observed on October 6, 2026.
kikai: if you would rather this came down, email support@areyouvisible.co and it is removed the same day, no questions asked.